Which candidate do you want to see naked

Let's be honest. There is not really much of a difference between the two major party tickets.


The Democrats have one old geezer and one young different whippersnapper. The Republicans have one old geezer and one young different whippersnapper. The winning team will make history by having a team member being the first of its race or gender ever to hold that position.


Neither party is really talking about issues that will affect our lives. It's become a popularity contest.
So, what should be the one question everyone should ask that separates the candidates?

Here comes the honesty part. Since there is not any real significant difference, go for the obvious one.


As you follow the campaign, turn down the volume and rely on your visual. Then ask yourself, for the next four and possibly eight years, which party member would you want to see naked.


OK, throw out McCain, unless you're a really sick pervert who happens to buy Playboy hoping to catch a glimpse of Hugh Hefner in the raw. Might as well toss Joe Biden out, too. He's got nice hair, though.


That leaves Obama and Palin. Obama is young, but he was never a beauty pageant contestant. And after seeing him riding that bicycle looking like Steve Erkel, seeing him naked wearing a helmet doesn't conjure up any pleasant desires. Therefore, Sarah Palin is the obvious choice, which is why she was chosen.


The eyeglasses and hair pulled back into a bun both serve a purpose. By design, she is portraying the "porno" movie librarian or fourth grade teacher type that fuels fantasies.


The glasses come flying off. The hair flows down her back as she sits adorned in only a two-piece American flag patterned bikini atop a moose while holding a shotgun across its back.


Think about it.
Has there ever been a presidential team member you have thought about seeing naked?

Cast your vote secretly and honestly. No intelligence required.